Cream Cheese is Extra

As my life as a measly high school student comes to a close I find myself more and more often thinking about my future and life beyond college. Of course there are things I would love to do when I graduate. I’d love to play video games for a living or go on reality TV and never have to work again, but let’s be realistic. I’ll probably end up working at multiple places in my career and doing things that college never really prepared me for. And to get to where I want to be in life I’m going to have to work hard? It seems common these days that the people who reap the benefits are not necessarily the ones who do the most work or are the best in their field. Cheating and lying, actions held in such low regard in elementary school, become the norm as adults enter the workplace. In the first chapter of Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner’s book Freakonomics the two authors chronicle cheating in today’s society. From teachers to sumo wrestlers, it seems everyone will tell a white lie if they think they can get away with it. What’s even worse is that this cheating often does go unnoticed. So, what does this mean? Is lying just a natural human tendency that appears more prevalent as we mature? And I’m not saying cheating doesn't occur in high school but cyber day homework isn't the same as someone’s salary. Well from what the Stephens say, it’s circumstantial. In the case of the teachers, lying about student’s test scores and artificially boosting them translated into bigger bonuses and better funding. In the case of the sumo wrestlers, purposely losing a fight with a winning record to help out another fighter resulted in gimme win later in the season. Both situations are low risk, high reward. High test scores can be attributed to better teaching and wrestling matches are virtually random. After reading this I figured I might as well start practicing now because it seems like everyone cheats in the real world. However, Steven² breaks the big news later: humans are naturally good. I know, I know, you’ve heard it a thousand times but they have evidence and a story to boot. A Wall Street man leaves his job to go sell bagels in corporate buildings. His friends ridicule him, giving up his large salary just to have a relaxing job, who would ever do that. He leaves bagel boxes in break rooms all over the city and a jar to leave payment, 25¢ a bagel. Turns out he gets almost 90% return on each box and distributes hundreds of bagels a day. He’s not making a surplus of money like he used to, but here’s the thing: he’s happier.

Improving Our Home

High school is one of the most stressful times in the life of the average American teenager. You're being told the rest of your life depends on the decisions you make when you're not even an adult yet. Simultaneously being pressured to perform at your peak academic ability and still maintain an active social and extracurricular life outside of the classroom, students need school to be a relaxing and creatively stimulating place. If given the time and money to "redecorate" St. Mark's I would provide students for places to be comfortable and efficient. Like Graham Hill says in his TED talk "Less Stuff, More Happiness" we need to consolidate our lives. Straight board wooden desks would be replaced by ergonomically designed chairs with ample writing space and leg room for those tall kids ;). Text books would be swapped out in favor of laptops, not iPads, where students can research on the web and type notes quickly in the middle of class. Smart boards would take the place of whiteboards, automatically saving teacher's notes and posting them on mySMHS. With enough space to let creativity flow students' time would be better put to use. However, school is still school, and everyone needs a break once in a while. Lunch periods, now less than half an hour long, would be lengthened to provide students with enough time to eat and hang out with friends (social interaction leads to better people skills and is key in healthy brain development in young adults). While all this lounging around is great, students, inevitably, would take advantage of their extra flexibility and misuse their teacher's time. In order to keep students listening, lessons would be more interactive, engaging the students in more enjoyable ways to learn. Pictures, videos, and live action would keep the student involved and is preferred over bland notes on a centuries old power point. The teaching/learning relationship between educator and student is only possible when the student WANTS to learn. These changes would provide enough downtime and relaxation that students no longer dread going to class. They welcome the change in environment and are eager to participate in studies. School should be a place where students go with the intention and ambition of learning something new every day. Without an environment stimulating learning and academic growth, we might as well be, as the great Jack Baldino says, "cavemen eating mud."

Fifty Shades of Alexander Pope

To be honest, I originally picked Alexander Pope's short poem "You know where you did despise" to do my poetry annotation and blog on because it really is short. I thought, two stanzas, piece of cake, it'll take like five minutes to annotate. Then I read the innuendo-filled ambiguity that is "You know where you did despise." I should have expected half as much, it is Alexander Pope after all. It's easy enough to understand at the beginning. The narrator accuses someone of despising his eyes and legs and thighs and his "little things." As an immature male teenager, poetry is not the first thing to come to mind. The second stanza, unfortunately, only reinforces this... unusual imagery again with the little things. As I tie a metaphorical tie on my Catholic school uniform of appropriate interpretations of literature I struggle to find a particularly "safe" understanding of the poem. What I keep coming back to and what I think is the important part of the piece are these little things. Could they be money? Secrets? Innocence? With all the suggestive descriptions I can only assume the little things are the narrator’s virginity or purity. The person being accused stole these things which apparently mean a lot to the narrator and everyone else. This is all coming from the guy who wrote "Rape of the Lock" so it's not too farfetched. On another note, I haphazardly label the narrator as male and the accused as female. Could this lend to my prostitution theory, who knows? The characterization in the second stanza makes me feel like I'm in a strip club with those, "fine black eyes, Taper legs, and tempting Thighs." At the same time as the narrator reprimands the, let's say, woman I feel as though she is not entirely at fault. By keeping the place and action unknown the narrator seems to have something to lose by identifying with such things. And the fact that he loses his little things, which apparently would cause some commotion, makes his situation look direr than hers. Basically what I think E. L James, err... I mean Alexander Pope is saying is to keep your s*** together. Don't go losing your little things in places you can't name with people with tempting thighs, it's all bad news.